Showing posts with label Animals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Animals. Show all posts

Horse Rescue Day & Shadowfax

The holiday refers to rescuing horses from slaughter. However, this post refers to a rescuing horse. 

My father is a fan of Tolkien but not a huge fan of movies. However, when Jackson's Lord of the Rings: Two Towers came out, he went to the movie with family members. Afterwards, he said,

"That movie was all about the horse!"

He was referring specifically to the scene where Shadowfax comes to Gandalf's call. Shadowfax arrives in slow motion. I don't honestly understand Jackson's choice here--except, okay, he is a beautiful horse.  

I suspect that this is one place where the visual film maker takes over from the storyteller. If a photographer can get an animal to do what the animal is supposed to do...

The photographer doesn't waste that moment. 

Shadowfax was played by Domero and Blanco. 


Animals That Talk and Why the Blogger (Mostly) Doesn't Care for the Trope

Re-post from 2005.

In a recent post about horses, I comment that I prefer books about animals to include humans. 

I'm not a huge fan of books which use animals exclusively (no people). The animals do all the same things humans do and wear the same kinds of clothes and have the same kinds of relationships and the only difference seems to be that they live in burrows or whatnot but otherwise, they are really just humans with furry faces. 

And I don't get it.

I'll leave Watership Down alone since I've never read it and I saw only 1/4 of the movie when I was a kid; I got so scared, my mom took me outside and let me run around the lobby and eye the candy counter. But I have never understood the appeal of Brian Jacques' books (and please don't hate me, Brian Jacques' fans!) As far as I can tell, it makes precious little difference in Brian Jacques' books whether the heroes are mice, rats, frogs, humans, coyotes or whatever.

Let me elaborate.

In Beatrix Potter, the animal-ness of the animals is intrinsic to the plot. They may be temporarily "dressed up" but they always revert to their animal natures, and their animal natures are at the crux of the stories. Peter Rabbit is acting like a rabbit, sneaking into the farmer's garden to steal cabbages. The squirrels in Squirrel Nutkin act like squirrels. Sure, they talk but their animalness is never forgotten. You couldn't replace Peter Rabbit with George Ape. (Speaking of simians, the same is true of the Curious George books.) C.S. Lewis does this in the Narnia books. There's no point in the animals acting human; there are plenty of humans acting like humans (poorly and nicely) to go around. [And I quite enjoyed Zootopia, especially the "naked" animals, since living arrangements are connected to animal-ness.]

Having written the above, though I don't much care for anthropomophized animals overall,  at least with Beatrix Potter and H.A. Rey and Lewis, I get it. 

I still prefer my protagonists to be human. Even that old-time classic The Wind in the Willows didn't change my mind. Really, I'm a humanoid-chauvinist.

After all, why write a book about frogs or moles or rats acting like humans when, voila, you could do a book about humans acting like humans!?

Here's what I think may be the answer. The appeal (and C.S. Lewis says as much in his autobiography and in Out of the Silent Planet) is the idea of animals and people being pals, hanging out. It isn't the biology that people like (a la Gerald Durrell); it's the image of animal-ness (or creature-ness) within the human sphere: something you can buddy up to but won't eat you. Similarly, many people like the idea of conversing with animals, as if animals would say more back than "Mine. Mine. Mine." or "Feed me. Feed me. Feed me NOW." The lion or badger or panda is a friend.

Even as a kid, the idea never appealed to me. I wanted a lion cub, yes, but I never thought it would like me. My attitude was reflected in my reading material. As mentioned, I didn't much care for Wind in the Willows. I love the Narnia books but mostly for the people and their quests. I read Animal Farm and yes, it's great, but I couldn't get into the movie. I adore the movie Babe, but I think Babe is an exception. (The animals are very animalish and the whole sheep-herding thing is necessary to the plot--that is, it isn't pigs and sheep and dogs pretending to be humans; it's pigs and sheep and dogs acting very piggy and sheepy and doggy. Beside, James Cromwell is so very, very great.) As mentioned in the previous post, I read and reread Black Stallion and then Frog when I was younger, and I loved them but never picked up another horse book except Black Beauty, which bored me senseless. I quite enjoy the older BBC version of All Creatures Great and Small but honestly, the thing I like best about it is that the vets actually put animals down.

Let me clarify that.

No, I don't like watching animals get killed, but I like people treating animals like animals and not like people in animal clothing.

As far as I'm concerned, my cats consider me a food bowl and their degree of love ends about two feet past the food bowl. They aren't little people. They're animals. They're kind of dumb; their learning capacity is about the same as a two-day old amoeba. They are more fun to watch than fish and less involved than dogs. But they aren't people. If they were people, I'd want them to get jobs and pay part of the rent. Not to mention the fact that they puke on my rugs and never change the litter box and like to play "I'm on this side of the door/now I'm on this side of the door" twenty times a day. One endures this with toddlers because they grow up. One endures it with pets because they are cuddly enough (and company enough) to pay off the downside. (And you can leave them for long weekends.) With anyone else, the house visit would end very quickly.

Which may explain my complete disinterest in the possibility of me and my cats exchanging views on the universe. [I do love the manga series A Man & His Cat, in part because the cats are treated like animals, not little people, but mostly because the story has expanded to include everything and everyone in the main character's universe!]

July 15th: Celebratration of the Horse Day: Frog

I can't say I LOVED horses when I was a kid. I was interested in riding them, not in communing with them.

However, one of my favorite books as a kid was Frog: The Horse That Knew No Master by Colonel S.P. Meek. It is out of print now and I know from direct experience that getting one of the author's other books through interlibrary loan is close to impossible.

Luckily, I own my childhood copy of Frog. It is a "taming the animal" book with a laid back hero (another one!) as the horse's rider. He is a member of the military--stationed, I believe, in Panama. And I'm sure the book has an underlying assumption of imperialism or something or other.

I honestly don't care. The individual chapters are stories about the horse and his rider rescuing people, including children, and delivering communiques and discovering a spy. The villain is a fellow officer who abuses horses--gotta hate him!--and tries to cheat in order to win a race.

If you can track the book down, I recommend it!

Cats in Manga: The Weirdness of Cats and Cat Owners

One of the reasons I love cats in manga so much is that manga doesn't glorify cats. Yes, it does shower them with an inordinate amount of love. But the love is attached not to cats' mysterious, supposedly worshipable natures but to how freakin' weird they are--

And how weird we are to put up with them. 

Man and His Cat by Umi Sakurai--an alluring series which has turned into a community/family/talent manga--showcases the two elements of cat ownership. I love the cat who is sleeping on the bed and then leaves but the human remains contorted into a weird position: I've done this!




Tough Guy with Cats

As I mentioned with Don Matteo, my boss--head of the English Department--at the local community college has a wall of pictures of Tough Guys with Cats. He is a big (sweet) guy whose cat, Ruby, roamed the campus for years. (I was privileged to have Ruby visit my classroom.) 

Consequently, I always keep an eye out for tough guys with cats. I was amazed to find one such scenario with, of all people, Chris Noth! 

As a tough guy on Law & Order, no less! 



Smelly Cats and Defunct Websites

Currently Available
Years ago, I worked for what I guess was supposed to be the new Yahoo or MSN: Examiner.com. 

The idea was to produce news that would have the same impact as news from larger, national sites, only the Examiner website would reflect local events. Reporters had to pick specific, local topics to comment on. 

I picked "Cats." I either wasn't plugged into "cat culture" in Portland, Maine (in retrospect, I should have linked up with the Greater Portland Animal Refuge League and showcased a cat a week on my feed) or Portland, Maine is more of a "dog" than "cat" city (also true). I struggled to come up with articles. 

In fairness, so did everyone. The company tried to pay us in "goods" (services), which interested me not at all. I wanted money.

However, I stuck with the organization until it folded (apparently, it has returned), and I regularly published--enough to keep myself active. It was good discipline and good practice at brainstorming ideas and churning out articles, even on a fairly meager topic. I ended up writing a great many entertainment-based articles (though I got special attention for posting a PowerPoint on how to make a cat game).

I recently thought of a topic, "Oh, I would post about that on Examiner!" 

Instead, I'm posting it here:

Smelly Cats

In the world of "problems with pets," dogs bite and bark. Cats smell and escape. 

Smelly cats show up in Major Crimes and on Friends. In "Two Options," Season 3 of Major Crimes, Rusty is requested to take a smelly cat out of its cage, so Lieutenant Tao can check it for a chip. 

At this point, if I was still working for the site, I would make a note to myself to write a separate article about "chips." My most recent cat Chloe has one (she came with it). I haven't bothered to register it. She is strictly an indoor cat and unlike some of my previous cats, she cannot get out. But the arrival of a cat with a chip in my house means that many owners are dealing with the pros and cons of the technology, whether they like to or not. 

In any case, to return to Rusty's ordeal...

Cats on television are rather like babies on television. The protesting cries nearly always occur when the cat's head is turned away. Viewers may rest assured that the animal is actually being well-treated--and is likely quite docile. 

Likewise, the cat, Princess, in "Two Options," may smell, but it is obviously beautifully maintained. 

On Friends, of course, "Smelly Cats" are idolized in Phoebe's tribute song. 

At this point, the Examiner article would address non-smelly cat litter and "dry" shampoo wipes for cat fur. 

It is much more fun to end with Phoebe's song. Her version comes first. The music video version is below. 



Fairy Tales: African American Folktales

African-American folktales are great examples of the process of adaptation that all folktales undergo. 

Despite the efforts of Grimm and Lang et al., there is no such thing as "pure" culture. Attempts to argue otherwise--once there was a pure culture and then it was corrupted but we can get it back--whether the argument is made by alt-right or alt-left theorists is balderdash. Humans like to make claims to stuff. But just because something currently seems tightly connected to a culture doesn't mean that it always ways. 

See chronocentrism here and here.

So "All God's Chillen Had Wings," a classic African-American tale, evokes elements from African tales, the condition of slavery in North American, and Christian texts.

Adaptation gives folktales their power--and their universality. They speak to a need to keep communicating, no matter what.  "Folklore," Hurston wrote, "is the boiled-down juice of human living."

I'm a fan of Zora Neale Hurston who began collecting African-American folklore before the Arts & Crafts Movement in America really took off--that is, she foresaw a need before it became popular. She took down tales in their "vernacular," respecting the tellers. 

One of my favorite collected tales by Hurston is "Mosquito Lies" where a "gnat" eats up  six-yoke and twelve-yoke teams! It drills through a cast-iron pot!

The exaggeration conveys the reality. If you've ever dealt with mosquitos in the Northeast and Southeast, you believe it! Though the image is from Alaska:

In addition, Virginia Hamilton, illustrations by Leo and Diane Dillon, has produced several beautiful anthologies of African-American folklore (see above), including Her Stories.  

Animals: Dead Dogs

Speaking of animals...

A surprising number of children's books end with dead animals, dead dogs in particular. As the Friends' clip indicates, Phoebe's well-meaning but ultimately unhelpful mother switched off films before the horrible endings. Phoebe is utterly shocked at Old Yeller's fate!

Maybe, instead, her mother should have put the movie in the freezer.

One children's book with a dead animal that works is L.M. Boston's The Stranger at Green Knowe. Hanno, the gorilla, escapes the zoo and ends up at Green Knowe where his presence is temporarily protected by Ping. The writer pulls no punches. Hanno's capture is detailed. The zoo's inefficiences are clearly presented. The keeper is portrayed as intelligent, kindly, and well-meaning. He knows Hanno's limitations in captivity but there is only so much he can do. The risk to Ping is clear--Hanno is not some cutesy, tamed pet. He may love Ping. He could also easily kill him.

Consequently, as the story moved towards its climax, I was at a loss for how it could possibly be resolved to any degree of satisfaction. 

And yet, the end is satisfactory. 

Finally, yes, yes, it's Cosby. And the clip is fantastic! (Dogs occur at the beginning; gorillas occur at the end.)



Cesar Millan: The King of Analogies

I am rewatching early seasons of the Dog Whisperer. Cesar Millan is an astonishing role model to me. He isn't really all that alpha (with people), but like Mike Rowe, he has the ability to immediately find a place for himself in hierarchies--to the point where the people he is helping will risk their egos by emulating Cesar without feeling combative. 

With dogs, Cesar Millan exhibits no hesitation at taking a dominant position. Various dog experts argue about whether pack-dominance is truly how dogs behave in the wild. Whatever. It's how they behave in homes and parks because their owners don't take responsibility for them.

Bob and Charlie wait for dinner.

I say this as someone who loves big dogs but doesn't own one (although I could in my current home) since I know I don't have the discipline to be a good owner. If I am going to treat my dog like a cuddly toy, I don't deserve to have one. I have applied some of Cesar's techniques to my cats, and they have worked!

The aspect of Millan's behavior/teaching/personality that impresses me the most is his calm, especially his continued calm even when dogs get aggressive or a certain approach doesn't immediately work. He doesn't
blame the dog. He doesn't get frustrated. He doesn't give up. He starts over. He asks his people, such as Todd, to bring the dog back. 

In this post, I want to praise Millan's gift for analogies. When he walks into a home, he finds a point of comparison between his instructions and the household to inspire clients. If the client is a coach, he uses a coach analogy. If the client is an actor, he uses acting analogies. 

He does this in live performances too, by the way. And he does it during conversations when it is clearly not scripted. It doesn't surprise me that he already knows something about the clients before he starts. He claims (in early episodes) not to do background research on clients, and I believe him. But the way episodes are filmed and cut means that Cesar is there for at least part of the time when the camera crew is filming the family "alone." 

It doesn't matter. Things like television editing don't upset me. It is obvious that outside of any narration or scripting, Cesar thinks in terms of analogies. And I would guess that this ability is what got him where he ended up. He started out as a dog walker, "four hours in Runyon Canyon" (no wonder the people who hired Cesar loved him so much--he really gave those dogs a work-out!). He made contact with celebrities. He got support to do his show. 

And behind all of this is a guy who keeps looking, searching, pondering for what will work in certain situations. 

In an episode at a dog park, he compares the humans' territorial behavior to regulars claiming a chair in Starbucks. 

In another episode, he encourages a woman to be more assertive by walking like Cleopatra. 

To another woman with a bad dating history, he points out that "you can't rehabilitate unstable men with affection."  Or dogs.

In one episode where a wife and husband claim that their retriever likes to "show off," Cesar says, "Well, this is L.A." 

He is naturally funny. Watch him in live performances; he has the gift of a mimic. He generates laughter with relatable jokes followed by physical imitation. He does it unconsciously in the early episodes. He seems to have become more comfortable with this ability over time. 

Cesar Millan is one of the few celebrities where I might put his poster on my wall! Okay, I haven't because I'm not really a celebrity fan girl (Cesar and Nimoy are just about it). But Cesar qualifies. 

Best Lines About Cats

It's summer, so I watched That Darn Cat again--the real version with Dean Jones and Hayley Mills.

It has fantastic lines about cats:

1. "Oh, it's nothing," Agent Kelso says about being scratched. "It's probably just an artery."

2. "We shall proceed with the paw-printing!"

3. "How do you follow a cat? They go through fences and culverts. They climb trees and phone poles."
I love this line. The FBI agent who delivers it is so matter-of-fact. Not, "Are you crazy?!" Just a poetic description of cat behavior. It is followed by an equally poetic response: "Wither he goest, you will go."

4. Patty to Kelso, "You can save the hypocrisy. He knows you don't like him." 

5. To Kelso's protest, "He certainly can't understand what I'm  saying, can he?" Patty responds, "Not everything, of course. He's just a cat. Mostly everything."  

6. The hilarious scene where Kelso temporarily thinks DC is speaking to him through the radio. "Be patient...Say that again? Let's just try and pull ourselves together."

7.  "I'm sorry but the cat's going out now. I've got to follow."

8.  Irritated Ingrid: "That cat's about as helpless as the U.S. Marine Corps." (In the books, the older sister is DC's protector and apologist.)

9. Patty about DC: "He's really diabolically clever."

10. Villain: "The cat's bugged."

11. Kelso, trying to explain away the bug: "What is he going to be dragging home next?!"

12. And of course, DC trips the villain down the stairs. "That darn cat!"
 

Observing Cats I: Saying Goodbye

What are they thinking?
As John Bradshaw remarks in his book Cat Sense: How the New Feline Science Can Make You a Better Friend to Your Pet, researching cats is a relatively new discipline. Dogs have been with us humans forever, living in our homes, guarding our property, organizing our sheep. But cats, even when domesticated, have lived parallel lives to humans (until recently). Scientific research and observation is being done even as I type--as are more popular forms of observation--but it is still relatively slim compared to the research and observation applied to dogs.

In the interests of science, therefore, I will being posting observations about my cats on occasion--especially since I already know far too much about their pee and poop habits! Although I am as capable of anthropomorphizing animals as anyone, I maintain that cats-be-cats, not humans in cat disguise. What I observe will not necessarily be a reflection of my state of mind.

Death and Cats

As Daniel Gilbert argues in Stumbling on Happiness, animals do not imagine the future (he then goes on to point on that although humans can and do, they aren't as good at it as they think they are). Animal behavior that appears to take the future into account actually comes from instinct and a kind of episodic memory bank (loud noises have occurred in this room: be careful!). But animals don't plan to become astronauts or imagine taking vacations. They don't even imagine what to do when YOU go on vacation.

Consequently, it is difficult to say (when humans are removed from the equation) whether animals really mourn each other (rather than just reflect their humans' emotions). When Aurora died, I was prepared for a few days of confusion on Bob's part, followed by complete indifference. I was sort of right. I was also sort of wrong.

To begin with, there is the issue of temperament. Max was a cat-who-thought-he-was-a-dog. When he got ill, his personality underwent a massive shift. Aurora--an older female cat with an aloof and self-sufficient temperament--ignored his decline. After he died, she adjusted almost immediately to his absence. She didn't go searching for him. Her routine didn't alter. And she took over the couch (the seat next to me in the living room).

Commemorative ornament.
On the other hand, when Aurora got ill, Bob--a 4-year-old of skittish habits who nonetheless likes to be around others--continued to associate with her. He would walk up to her and lick her forehead. He would look for her in the apartment. He would eat food alongside her. Although Aurora become very restless, her personality didn't alter substantially. Bob did not ignore her at any point.

When she died, Bob would go into the closet (where she liked to sleep), find her smell, leave the closet and go looking for her. After I vacuumed out the closet, Bob responded by staying under the bed (I didn't remove Aurora's smell/fur from there until a week later). He stopped going into the living room. The living room has always made him nervous (open windows: truck noises!); still, he had spent time in the living room when Aurora was alive.

Although I continued to get weepy (and still do), Bob adjusted to Aurora's death within three days (I am opposed to humans insisting that their animals mourn with them, so he got no pressure from me one way or the other). He no longer searched for her. He returned to the living room (helped by me shutting the windows, eliminating the scary truck sounds). And he took over the chair (the seat next to me in the living room).

Three days later than his adjustment, I thought I would lose my mind. Unlike Aurora, who adjusted to the absence of another cat without pause, Bob clearly dislikes being left alone. He began to demand more affection and playtime when I was home and before I left in the mornings. Some cats you can feed, and they saunter away without a backwards glance. Some cats you feed, and they curl up in your lap. Some cats you feed, and they demand to be entertained. Bob has always fallen into the last category--running off to the hall or living room and standing over a toy as soon as he lapped up a little breakfast. After Aurora's death, his demands became more vocal and insistent.

Aurora and Bob
I don't believe that Bob was necessarily demanding another pet in the house. I point this out because I think it is customary for pet owners to claim that their animals want thus-and-so when it is really the human's needs and desires that are being satisfied. (My animal wants me to buy a new bed! A new entertainment system! A new car!)

What I do know is that I don't have the time or energy to keep Bob fully entertained. "I have to go to work," I will tell him. "I'm the person who pays for all your food." Which means absolutely nothing to an animal with a fetish for warm bodies.

 To be continued . . . 

Aurora: The Cat Who Went With Me Everywhere

This week, I decided it was time for my oldest cat Aurora to go to kitty heaven (which actually, yes, I do believe in).

Aurora was 19-1/2 years old, the oldest cat I have ever known personally. The decision to euthanize was easier than with my cat, Max. Max was 14, which is within the normal range but seemed relatively young to me (I grew up with a cat that lived to be 3+ years more). I wasn't prepared to make THAT decision. Consequently, I put off making it far too long.

I refused to let Aurora decline and suffer as badly. When she stopped eating, I immediately begun to watch for other signs. This past Saturday, I made the decision to wait until after the weekend. It was the right decision since I got to take her to our regular vet: The Cat Doctor. It also meant that both she and I were ready. The decision was still difficult (it is never easy!), but comparatively easier than with Max.

Living without her has been far more difficult. Aurora was my "first" cat. (I don't count Sidney, my cat in high school. To put it bluntly, Aurora was the first cat for whom I paid the vet bills!)

I got Aurora from a private owner when I was living in Washington State (1995). She was actually too young, being barely 6 weeks. (Many shelters won't let kittens go until after 8-10 weeks). She literally fit into the palm of my hand. When I was at work, she would creep into the gaps of my box spring mattress. The first time I came home and couldn't find her, I desperately called her name. I heard "mew mew mew" and turned around to find her scampering to me from under the bed.

At night, she would sleep in my hair--yep, I had long hair in those days!

I felt so guilty about her being so young and having no playmate that I would drive 20 minutes each way at lunch to see her: that meant I could only spend 20 minutes petting her, but I didn't mind! At the time I lived in a studio apartment; to entertain Aurora (she was quite active in those days), I would throw balls of paper from one end of the "shoebox" to the other. After we ran through one pile (about 20 of so paper balls), I'd switch positions.

We drove across country in a 1989 Dodge Colt that looked
very much like this 1983 model. From Hatch Heaven.
I moved from Washington to Maine (with a month's break), starting August 1996. Aurora took the trip alongside me! After several test drives during which she snuck under the brakes and clutch (it was a stick-shift), I finally broke down and got a large wire kennel cage that took up half the back seat (every book on traveling with pets says to do this anyway). I added an upside down cardboard box that she could either sit on or sleep inside--plus lots of blankets, a tiny litter box, and bowls.

I discovered pretty quickly that, like her owner, Aurora gets car-sick in the backseat. Every single day started out the same: I started driving--Aurora threw up--I cleaned out the cage--Aurora was fine the rest of the way.

The car was also not air-conditioned--which on the highways made no difference. In the cities and in states with lots of construction (yes, Utah, I mean you!), the car would get unbearably hot and Aurora would start hyperventilating. I would pour water on her head from a water bottle which sounds awful but actually helped.

During that trip, she stayed at a house with a ferret (which freaked her out), a house with another cat (which she didn't mind so much except she and the other cat got into a pissing and pooping match--who can fill up the other cat's litter box the most?!), multiple hotels (which she liked), a cozy bedroom in West Virginia (which she liked) and a basement in Ohio (which she didn't). She spent a few days in upstate New York before we both drove on to Maine, where she stayed on Peaks Island; there she met her brother Max.

Aurora and Bob
From Peaks Island, Aurora moved to an apartment on Woodfords Corner, then an apartment in the West End, and finally, to our current apartment; this means that over her lifetime, Aurora adjusted to a total of five apartments (in Washington, I lived in a much larger and much nicer apartment than the studio apartment for six months before moving to Maine). She was happiest in the last: more roomy than some of the others, fewer intruding smells (although by the time we moved into this apartment, Aurora had reached the utterly-unfazed-by-anything stage of life). 

She also tolerated two brothers, Max and Bob. Max she mothered and played with. Bob she accepted and agreed to play with (she did perk up after Bob arrived). She is survived by Bob--and me.
Feed Me!
Courtesy: Jen Jones

In terms of idiosyncrasies, for most of her life, Aurora would eat anything, including curry! She had a VERY loud yowl. She was shyer with people than my male cats have been. She was a better hunter than my male cats with sharper eyes (spotting birds on telephone wires) and (up until recently) better hearing. After Max died and gave up the position of animal-who-gets-to-sit-on-Kate's-lap-while-she-watches-TV, Aurora took over that position, only relinquishing it in the last two weeks. (When Bob took it over, I realized that both animals were sending me a message.)


Of all my cats, Aurora has been the most classic: short-haired tabby with all the proper markings, beautiful brown-tipped fur with a golden layer underneath, and huge, huge eyes. 

Altogether, Aurora Woodbury had a remarkable life--for a human, let alone a cat--and bore it with remarkable sangfroid, even for a human!

I Am Now an Examiner!

I recently became an Examiner at Examiner.com. Examiner.com is a cross between About.com and a local news outlet (like Maine Today.com).

I am a Portland Cats Examiner. As far as I can tell, I am the only one currently posting though I suspect this will change. My approach is more advice-oriented than news-oriented, but I do include links to local businesses, etc.

My first article is "So, You Want to Get a Kitten." A related article "There's a New Kitten in the House: What to Do" will follow at the end of this week.

The Portland Cats' page has been added to Votaries's Related Links. Over the next few months, I will be posting about Emergency Services, toys, cat names, gross medical problems, etc. etc. etc. If you have any ideas or any particular topic you'd like to see addressed, I'm collecting as many as I can!

Cats and Death

My cat, Max, died this morning at about 10:30 a.m. (July 26, 2010). I had him put down.

I'm writing this partly because writing helps me work things out but also because I want this post out there for anyone who ever feels as overwhelmed and anxious as I did about this decision. There's a lot of different opinions on the web about cat care; over the past week, I think I've read and synthesized most of it.

Although this was not the first time I'd seen a pet die, it was the first time that (1) the decision lay on my shoulders; (2) the cat's condition wasn't something I'd encountered before. Max had been failing for several months (rapidly over the course of the last week), but he wasn't actually paralyzed and occasionally looked alert.

What happened first?

First, I got Max in October 1996. I was living with my parents at the time, and I got him on Peaks Island. He was the friendliest of a group of kittens I went to look at. My older cat, Aurora, demonstrated some maternal instincts when he first showed up after which she promptly decided he was nuts. They more or less got along over the past 14 years.

Max continued to be the friendlier of the two cats although Aurora has livened up as she has gotten older! But Max always had to be where people were, investigating them and their stuff. He also wanted affection on a pretty constant basis: my high-maintenance cat. He was the kind of cat who would beg you for food, eat a couple of bites, and then rush back into the room to climb all over you. There were times when I thought he was going to climb inside my skin, he wanted affection so bad.

The first sign of trouble was this May when Max had labored breathing. The emergency animal clinic put him on prednisone which seemed to help; however, about the middle of June, he stopped eating. I switched from dry to wet food and got him to eat a few times a day. He began to get very weak in his back legs. He was no longer grooming himself, so I did that; he would still visit the litter box.

This past week, he stopped eating entirely unless I forced him though he would drink. He also began to search out hiding places. This, of course, was a radical personality change from the Max I was used to.

This weekend, he began to wheeze while laying on his side. He seemed to be in a catatonic state rather than asleep.

He did not cry although picking him up in certain ways obviously hurt him. Animals do not always show when they are in pain (they certainly don't have signs, saying, "Excuse me, I'm in pain"), but I formed the conclusion that he was.

Late Saturday night, I questioned whether I should take him to the emergency clinic to be euthanized even though I had just had his records moved to a regular veterinarian and wanted to take him there. After doing some research on the web, I formed the conclusion that he might die at home (which might be best) and that if he didn't, waiting until Monday to be absolutely sure he wasn't going to improve was the best option.

This morning, Monday, his condition was the same except he was slightly perkier (the weather is cooler). I made the appointment and took him in.

From my perspective, Max was very unhappy. However, based on the stuff I had read on the Internet, he certainly didn't look like a desiccated, hair-matted, eyes-filmed-over, at-death's-door cat. A part of me thought, Maybe, it is just asthma. We'll be going home with medication in two ticks.

However, I kept reiterating to the staff that I didn't want him to be put through lots of complicated and anxiety-producing tests. I would be doing it for me—and I was perfectly capable of doing it for me: What's VISA for?—not for him.

The extremely experienced vet (The Cat Doctor in Portland, Maine) was wonderful. She was practical and sympathetic without being maudlin or feeding me any "this is what you should have done" or "this is what GOOD owners do" stuff. It was clear within a few minutes that to her, Max's quality of life was so diminished that keeping him alive would be more for me than for Max. We took him into a room where she did a cursory exam (to make me happy, I think), and she was able to state that his problems were likely lung and/or heart-related and not the types of problems that could be cured or even managed without causing the cat a great deal of distress.

That wasn't what I wanted, so I gave the go ahead for him to be euthanized.

The Internet made it sound like he would be hooked up to some crazy machine, but she actually did it right there, right then. She pulled out a needle, already prepared (over the phone, I had put forward the possibility that Max would need to be put down, and she actually had two needles with her), and inserted it. She told me that there might be a brief struggle as the animal felt himself falling to sleep. But actually, Max didn't struggle at all. He was gone in less than two minutes without a complaint.

By the way, The Cat Doctor has tissue boxes ALL OVER THE CLINIC.

My options were to take the body with me, have a private cremation, or have a group cremation.

My parents offered to bury Max on the island which would have been appropriate, but I really didn't want to carry my dead cat around Portland. The idea of keeping an urn of my animal's ashes is thoroughly creepy. I opted for the group cremation and to have a mold made of Max's paw print.

The whole visit cost $100. I feel this is very reasonable although I realize other people may want cheaper options. Based on my Internet research, some shelters will euthanize for free. However, most vets charge around $50 for euthanasia and $50 for cremation (more, for personal cremation).

So what about my older cat, Aurora?

She's extremely healthy physically (she's two years older than Max, being 16). In terms of her mental? instinctual? state, I'm not sure. She has ignored Max over the last two months. Animals can tell when other animals are dying; Aurora was actually, probably, the best indicator I had for how far gone he was, I just didn't see it.

She loves that I now serve wet food (mixed with dry).

Whether she will miss him or not, I have no idea. When she wanders around the house, it is hard to know if she is looking for Max or hoping I left some food out somewhere.

People say pets grieved, but I'm very wary of believing what people say about their pets: so often, it seems that the wish precedes the evidence. They want to see their own grief reflected in the remaining animal. The animal may actually be reacting more to the owner's emotional/instinct-based aura than to anything else.

In which case, Aurora is just going to have to suffer. Sorry. But I miss Max like crazy; I can't just switch it off.

How about another pet?

It is very tempting to go out TODAY and get a little kitten. But I'm opposed to that course of action for three reasons. The first is that I wouldn't be replacing Max; I would be trying to soothe my feelings. And the new kitten wouldn't BE Max. (This would be true even if I cloned Max; the new kitten would be itself; I've never understood why people think that two things are the same just because they share the same DNA. This isn't a nature or nurture thing. It's just a reality thing.)

Second, according to Cesar Millan, when an animal comes into a grieving household, it doesn't say, "Oh, I am so sorry for you all. How sad!"

It says, "These creatures are weak. Weak creatures are bad. I must control them!"

Or, rather, it doesn't think at all. It just does it.

I don't want a new kitten running my house. In any case, it deserves more equilibrium.

Finally, I have a more steady paycheck in the fall. New kittens cost!

Still, the new vet is all lined up!

Conclusion

To conclude, if you have an ill/dying/unhappy cat, and you are really worried about what direction to go . . . I can't really tell you except you should trust your observations. One of the websites I read said, "My vet told me I would know when it was time." In retrospect, this is totally correct.

It is retrospect. However, when I told the vet, "I've been expecting him to be dead every morning over the last few days," she replied that when an owner feels this, it is likely time for the pet to go. I think this is close to what I read: the owner knows better than anyone what quality of life the animal is used to.

If you are worried that the vet will berate you for choosing euthanasia, the good ones won't. They will give you multiple options. If I had walked in there and said, "I want the full work-up! Save his life at all costs!!" they would have done it (as much as they could, at least). But it would have been the wrong decision, and the vet was very clear about where Max stood health-wise.

If you are worried that the process is ultra-expensive, it isn't although you can make it ultra-expensive! I feel that I gave Max dignity without sacrificing my checkbook to some ridiculous extravaganza that would make me feel . . . well, just as bad actually since it wouldn't bring him back. (If I were more solvent, I would have gone with the private cremation and sprinkled his ashes on Peaks Island; I don't think Mom's tulips would have minded. But I will never keep an urn of anyone's ashes in my house. I understand bones; bones are cool. Dirt is just dirt. And, in truth, I kind of like the idea of my cat being cremated with lots of other animals: it's a circle of life thing.)

And finally, if you are worried that it is painful for the animal, from what I witnessed, it wasn't at all. My vet did let me stay with Max which I'm not sure I would have been able to do if I'd taken him to the emergency clinic. He was calm when he got the injection, and I pet him until he passed. They also did all the administrative business in the room, so I didn't have to go bawl in the waiting area which made me very grateful.

Max was a really good cat, and he had a really good life. R.I.P.