Problems with Utopias: Chronocentrism, the Worst of Times

Chronocentrism has two aspects. Nobody captured both aspects better than Charles Dickens:

It was the best of times. It was the worst of times. 

One of the most distasteful aspects of utopias/dystopias is the belief, Nothing/no place has ever been as great or as horrible as what we are going through right now! 

Trickle-down CRT is enormously distasteful precisely for this reason. If you are confused why any group of people would voluntarily agree to be the enemies in someone else's narrative (rather like acquiescing to an emotionally abusive relationship), the explanation here is ready-made: 

It puts that group at the center of everything.

And since the bad behavior on the table is entirely theoretical (and uncontrollable), it places the real pain and horror--as well as any real responsibility--at a distance. People actually believe that adopting the right terminology is the equivalent of "doing something."

It isn't.

Chronocentrism is one reason my church lost its cultural hold on me fairly early. I just couldn't buy into the idea that I was a member of a "special" generation. I didn't want to be. And the more I learned about history, the less I thought I was. Moreover, there are few things as distasteful as sitting in an air-conditioned (if slightly smelly) or heated (slightly smelly) church building with scores of paid-for cars outside in the parking lot while well-fed people who live in houses and apartment buildings, some on assistance, some not, complain about the evil world in which they live and how bad everything has gotten. We live in the end of times! 

The idea that all life has been leading up to "now" is a patent, egocentric falsehood. 

First, the Worst of Times

In pre-written-history, a single skirmish led to the elimination of an entire clan. The child mortality rate was incredibly high. For most of history, healthcare, for all people, was more or less a crapshoot--though people were trying. Medical conditions, ones that appall us now, like dying from rabies, dysentery, and blood poisoning, were commonplace. Plagues/pandemics didn't just shut down businesses for a year. They wiped out 2/3rds of the population and changed the economic and often the political landscape forever (such changes are, to an extent, still true: that is, disease and volcanoes do more than theory to alter social orders). 

Few people, men, women, minorities, non-minorities, had rights. Most people worked on farms/the land, which doesn't mean they didn't have individual problems and romances and ideas. But we don't know because most of them didn't write stuff down. They couldn't write. For most of history, most people couldn't write and most of them couldn't read, and that statement includes royalty. Children worked and the ones who didn't were treated like pawns to be moved around a chessboard.

Conscription was a regular occurrence. Debtors' prisons were a reality. Slavery existed on every continent--and for most of history, it included most populations. It varied in practice. It was still a given.

The variety of food in our current culture simply didn't exist. People ate so they wouldn't die, not for the sake of a "balanced" diet. Many leaders deliberately starved members of their countries up and beyond Stalin's Russia. Destroying a country's agriculture--salting the earth--in battle was considered a norm.

Death by hanging was commonplace and issued for multiple infractions, most of which we would consider minor. Death by guillotine was considered kinder. Torture was considered a legitimate investigatory device, not something to be debated or prevented.

There was no such thing as a free press. The left and right's use of "news" for political ends was commonplace. The world was Twitter--only slower on the dissemination end. Sex in office, fraud in office was business-as-usual.

And I could keep going... 

Pessimism, however, misses the point. In reality, each person is stuck in the head/body of an individual (it's biology, folks) and the conditions and time period of that person's birth. Like Sam Beckett, the Quantum Leap character, we skip back and forth along a line that began with our birth and ends with our death. Anything before or beyond that line is a matter of faith. 

There is no good reason--other than ego--to borrow trouble from a false belief that "nothing has ever been as bad as what happens to ME!"

Sufficient unto the day, and the person, is the evil thereof. 

To be continued...

2 comments:

Joe said...

A musing

Consider that for specific people, time and place, you may have the best or worse of times.

Pompeii in late AD 79 would be the worse. Southern California in the 1950s and 1960s was amazing. Our neighborhood in the 1960s and 1970s was close to idyllic. Yet, at the same time, horrible things were happening elsewhere in the country or the world.

I find it interesting that even in the same family or group, a time period may seem completely the opposite to various members. The most obvious are when parents shield their children from how bad things really are (financially, medically, whatever.)

Then there are expectations and not knowing the alternative (this latter drives me nuts with shows that attempt to recreate the past. You see someone struggling with something that would be second nature to a real contemporary.) As far as I know Great-Grandpa Esplin loved Orderville. So did Grandma. At that era, I can see why. Oh, but A, B & C! Yeah, but it was way better than Muddy Flats, Nevada.

(Speaking or Orderville, its elevation is 5449 feet! For some reason--perhaps because I've only been there in the summer and its relatively proximity to St. George--I thought it was lower.)

Dan said...

Chronocentrism has a valid component. Some times are better than others and for good reasons. Northeast Ohio (Youngstown), was a good place until the 1970s. But then the steel industry collapsed and the economy was wiped out. Youngstown now consistently rates as one of the "worst" cities in America. Yet, there are still jobs in Youngstown and there are people who are doing well and enjoying life in Youngstown. It's just that there are a lot of people unemployed and underemployed, crime is elevated, and public services and infrastructure are below par.

Chronocentrism can also serve as a valuable motivation. Believing one has a special opportunity to do something, even if the belief is mythical, can be personally and organizationally useful. At a minimum it is better to have some motivation than none at all. Sure, the religious angle that the 1980s were ushering in the millennium was overdone. But for myself the idea that "I was special" was never more than the general thought that I had important opportunities ahead of me and I should be optimistic about the future.

A problem with Chronocentrism is that it becomes solely a manifestation of egocentrism. "We're #1" may be a fun chant at a ball game. It is mindless rhetoric when repetitively declared one generation after another - if everyone is special, no one is special. Likewise, focus on life being bad and getting worse becomes an excuse and a bogeyman, which may be why politicians love to use the "never been worse" attack against opponents.

An underappreciated aspect of humanity is how dynamic it is. Whatever the prevailing current, there are myriad countertrends and innovations. This is the main reason why everything can be simultaneously getting worse and getting better. Sears and K-Mart can go out of business - life is horrible - but they are replaced by something better - life is wonderful.

The resilience of humanity creates a real problem which is that it appears not to matter what choices society makes. In the real world, failure is an option and we get a whole lot of it. At the same time, failure creates opportunity and a neighborhood's or city's decline becomes a basis for renewal, or the motivation for people to move to a better place. The problem with this reality is we end up with a public sector that rarely stands accountable for bad outcomes. As recently happened in Jackson Mississippi, years of city mismanagement resulted in the water system failing. A multiple of usual reasons were given for the failure. But then the water was restored and the problem dropped off the radar. People's attention will turn to other problems and the officials responsible for failing to maintain the water system will skirt blame, only to fail again later.

So I am conflicted. We can see ourselves in a special time with a heightened sense of responsibility to elevate ourselves and our community. But this can lead to disappointment and delusion. Or we can accept life is just a constant "whack-a-mole", appreciate the moment we are in but not feel a special need to make changes. This can lead to cynicism that nothing we do matters.