In her essay about Edmund, "King Edmund the Cute: Anatomy of a Girlhood Crush," Diane Peterfreund explains why Edmund is her favorite of the Narnian heroes. He's mine too, and I agree with Peterfreund's analysis. She points out that Edmund qualifies as a bad boy, but what makes him appealing is that he is a reformed bad boy: a bad boy who uses his bad boy past to gain insight into himself and others.
Peterfreund
points out, "Edmund...seemed [to me] to have pulled it together. He
may have been somewhat graver than Peter, but he was still a cheerful
guy, overall." In other words, he isn't a brooder.
Totally!
In terms of writing, Lewis's success with Edmund is three-fold:
1. Edmund's "fall" is very human.
He isn't a sociopath. He is a normal human with normal resentment. He does betray his family--and that reality is not glossed over or excused by Lewis--but not for Big Bad, larger-than-life reasons. He isn't plotting to overthrow the universe. More Spike than Angel, his "fall" is human, rooted in day-to-day behavior (Lewis makes the point that Edmund has been away at a horrible school and has picked up horrible snide habits, again without excusing Edmund). Edmund's salvation is also very human. For instance--
2. Edmund retains his personality.
Edmund repents and recovers. And he gains a reputation of being wise with level-headed judgment.
He doesn't lose what makes him Edmund, however. In Voyage of the Dawn Treader, when talking to Eustace, he says, "You were only an ass, but I was a traitor." The tone is perfect. Edmund isn't apologetic. He isn't sappy. He isn't whining. He is matter-of-fact and even slightly sardonic.
And it is notable that Eustace tells his story to Edmund first. Edmund has a practical nature that tackles problems in a practical fashion. The cousins have one characteristic in common.
3. Edmund's repentance or restoration is something he takes seriously.
He doesn't dwell on his mistakes but he does use them. In Prince Caspian, when the siblings are lost, Edmund takes Lucy's side on where they should go next, precisely because he once let her down.
In sum, Edmund isn't just a bad-boy-reformed. He is a consistent and believable character. Lewis accomplishes this feat through entirely non-dramatic characterization.
No comments:
Post a Comment