The author argues that Hitchcock was fascinated by violence. He anticipated Psycho early on. One of his first films kills off an innocent boy unwittingly carrying a bomb (the death occurs off-camera). When questioned about his penchant for violence/horror, Hitchcock referenced his English upbringing and specific stories from his childhood. (Over the years, the specific stories became somewhat "prepared.")
It's the dog that stands out in Sandlot, |
not adult concerns. |
But kids aren't necessarily influenced by the obvious. In Surprised by Joy, C.S. Lewis references the terrible schools he attended. However, at one point, he pauses and states that although one particular school was probably, on paper, the worst of them all with a mad headmaster and the boys reduced to near poverty-level survival, he doesn't remember it as the worst. He and the other boys bonded against the crazy adult. It was later schools when the boys were split and torture was endured individually that stood out to Lewis as far worse.This is truth. Over and over again, psychological analysis records that kids are less traumatized by a state of weirdness and more traumatized by an outlying event within that weirdness and by reactions to that weirdness. The constant questioning, the adult panic, the oddness of other people's reactions is what stands out to them, not the event itself.
War and even COVID won't appear strange to them until the strangeness becomes charged with someone else's emotions.
It is entirely believable that Hitchcock was frightened as a child by events that stood out from the ordinary everyday rather than the terror of "war" as an event. After all, the kids in Hope & Glory cheer when the school blows up!
No comments:
Post a Comment