data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f29b9/f29b959f10d559db12c178ddaa10ea2c9f134a3d" alt=""
And it's cute. Unfortunately, it also proves an important aspect of secondary characters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1013b/1013b66ab78c00a6698e0d69a12733d460b1a4c9" alt=""
But so much Gopher is distracting rather than helpful. And it illustrates an important but problematic point for TV execs:
Just because a secondary character is excellent and hilarious in a particular role does not mean that secondary character can sustain a show.
Of course, sometimes the secondary character can. Frasier succeeded to an impressive degree. But much of the time: no. Of the two Frasier brothers, I find Niles far more sympathetic. But I have never believed for a second that David Hyde Pierce could (or would want to) star in his own show.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/707d8/707d8528647a96ddf129728ebb98fa4e365e8807" alt=""
It isn't that the characters aren't awesome. It is that their awesomeness comes precisely from how they play-off their surroundings--surroundings in which they are often perfect. Wilson (Earl Hindman) (from Home Improvement) willingly hid his face (watch him during season endings; he hams up his part of "masked man" when he takes his bows) for seven seasons. And we love him for it and always will.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af8b4/af8b4d13547e2bec3d3e4b8986ab0f12e714e5d1" alt=""
is...
"No. Less truly is more."
Gopher is best when he is running about the ship, interacting or reacting to other characters. In that role, he truly excels.
No comments:
Post a Comment