Raskin deserves credit for her aloof protagonists being full characters who transcend the archetype. She accomplishes this feat through the following writing choices:
(1) Raskin avoids omniscience. However clever, her protagonists are operating within specific parameters alongside idiosyncratic people who don't operate entirely according to plan;
(2) Raskin gives her protagonists flaws; they are idiosyncratic themselves, beyond merely being jerks.
House, for instance, is sarcastic and grumpy. And I enjoyed the early seasons of House. But I always felt that the audience was being invited to agree with House: "Yeah, isn't it stupid to have to do that petty bureaucratic stuff like fill out charts?!"
Raskin's protagonists are more like Sherlock than House. Sam Westing has a sweet scene in which he waxes nostalgic (I won't give away more) and Garson is haunted by choices he made in the past. However, Garson is not allowed to wallow; he too needs to learn to move on.
I highly recommend both books, especially the second which doesn't get enough attention!
No comments:
Post a Comment